From a "letter" I wrote as a Facebook status:
Dear Southern Baptist leadership,
Your conviction to ban gay rites does not constitute an argument to deny gay rights. Your conviction against equality, dignity, and worth for gay people is no different than the conviction that birthed your convention: it was in 1845 in Augusta, Georgia that the SBC was formed to defend the practice of slavery as ordained of God. It took over a century then, and it may take over a century now for the SBC to repent and lament its bigotry and it's use of God's name in vain. This Holy Week is an opportunity for the people of God in the SBC and other denominational structures to allow the agendas of power and self righteousness and greed to die so that the church can become a place for life instead of whitewashed tombs.
I would Cc a copy of this to the local denominational leadership of my own church's denominations (Christian Church, Disciples of Christ-Southwest region, Northeast Area, Texas-and the United Church of Christ, South Central Conference) that often communicate a love for the "most important seats in the synagogues and respectful greetings in the marketplace" than for advocating for the people for whom the gospel was intended (specifically: everyone). They say that the church in America is dying. Let it die--this week reminds me that sometimes that's what happens on the way to resurrection.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
FRONT AND CENTER: Why the Open Table is central to our identity as Church
I grew up in a church that was pulpit centered. The communion table was only used for communion on special communion Sundays (nothing wrong with that, necessarily) and so the other Sundays it was the Bible table...a table that held a large Bible, the offering plates, and sat in front of the pulpit. The pulpit was the center of the church. And not just architecturally. As a member of a Baptist church, the Bible and the preaching and proclamation of scripture was central to our identity as Christians, Baptists, and as a church. I treasure the enrichment that centrality of scripture brought to my life. But my journey has taken me to a different place, to a different understanding of being church. It isn't that I was wrong (or "they" were wrong), it isn't that the Word of God and scripture is no longer central to my identity as a Christian...it is, rather, that the way that Word is portrayed within community, how it shapes the community, and how that community looks is now centered now on the table. And it makes perfect sense to me now. After all, Jesus' pulpit was often a table...sitting at a meal. And if it wasn't a table, it was a hillside or a plain where Jesus sat the people down to...miraculously feed them. A table. It isn't that the pulpit isn't central in my being church anymore. It's just that the pulpit, the place where Word is preached and the Spirit builds community is best expressed as a table now.
The table of which I speak, by the way, is an OPEN table (something quite different for most of us who come from various religious backgrounds, including my Baptist upbringing). The idea is that all are welcome because we are all broken. We have all been the oppressed, but we have also been the oppressors. Here's how it works: we ALL need something at the table, and the sacrament there transforms the hearts of everyone who meets God at that table...or, more accurately, everyone whom God meets there.
It is open because we believe that not only are all in NEED of redemption, but that the Lord of the table has invited all people to come, thereby opening the WAY of redemption for everyone. It means that, as an openly gay man, I do not want to go to a church that would deny communion to James Dobson or to Pat Robertson because they have been hurtful and wrong about the gay community (among other things). If my church refused to share communion with the gay bashers, what's the point? After all, when we center our message around the table, it means that the story of redemption we proclaim, our good news, the gospel, is one that calls EVERYONE and says that EVERYONE is worthy of love, grace, and forgiveness. Even Fred Phelps. Even me.
It's almost easier to center a church around a pulpit ...you just gather around it everyone who agrees with the pronouncements that come from the pulpit. But when you center your church around an open table (and, in our church it IS, literally, the center of the worship space up front), what you are saying is that no one is left out, no one is unworthy, no one is too far gone, no one is too good to not need it, or too bad to not be invited. It means that Hitler gets to take communion at your church. And Pilate. And that Judas gets to dip his hand in the bowl with you. For most of my life, I considered the open table to be the EASY way out--you didn't have to offend anyone by telling them they couldn't take the Lord's Supper. Now I realize just how hard it is to live out an open table in our life as church. It isn't easy at all. It means realizing that God wants to redeem my broken, victimized life and make it whole...but also that God wants to bring wholeness and forgiveness and redemption to all those people who broke me and made me a victim in the first place. And, ultimately, it means recognizing that it MUST be this way, for I have also broken others and wounded others. I may not be "as bad" as the guys on death row, or as bad as those who have hurt me...but is it possible that I may be just "as loved" as they are? That, indeed, they are as loved as me?
That's a tough walk for a disciple. A table-centered church chooses the hard way of building community and of doing God's will on earth as it is in heaven. It isn't always smiles and Kumbaya...it is sometimes the really tough work of being the recipient and the conduit of extravagant grace.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Lent Made Easy
How to Make Lent an Easy Journey in 3 Easy Steps!
A Sermon based on Luke 4:1-13
Lent is that journey that lasts for 40 days, reminding us of the 40 days Jesus spent in the wilderness in preparation (according to the gospel writers) for his earthly ministry. At the end of those 40 days of solitude and fasting, he faced temptation to fulfill his ministry in various ways--to satisfy his own human desire for food/stuff, power, and comfort. He made the hard choice...the one that ended in crucifixion, mind you, but Lent doesn't have to be that hard for you. As you face these same temptations today, here's how to make Lent an easy journey in three easy steps.
1. Give up candy or something as a pious religious act instead of really contemplating what it means to be hungry and seeing the physical and spiritual hunger of those around you and sitting in the dirt with those who suffer and grieve and hunger. Use your religious beliefs as an excuse to feed yourself on the hope of a better world some day and ignore the hope of a better world today. Lent is an easy journey when you make it all about what you can get out of your religion.
2. Make Lent all about you being in control of your life instead of giving up any kind of advantage you might have in order to serve others. Worry more about what other people think about you and live in a way that will put on a good face for the world. Give your life as an offering at all the right temples the world has to offer...make your life one big Facebook timeline that you control the status updates for so that people never have to know the you that struggles, that slips and falls, that grieves, that loses...that way, you'll never have to stop your pursuit of power and fame in order to help someone else. Unfriend sinners in the Easy-Lent-Facebook of life--surround yourself with people that make you look like the person you want everyone to think you are. Don't check in at the hospital when you're sick, at the rehab center when you are in recovery, at the thrift shop when you are poor, at the soup kitchen when you are hungry. You worship control, advantage, and influence now...don't let down your guard this Lent to acknowledge that you don't have it all together. If you do that, you might find yourself surrounded with other people who don't have it all together either--and you might have to hug someone who isn't very loveable, feed someone who isn't very nice looking, share your story of redemption with someone who desperately needs redemption too. Lent is an easy journey when you just make it all about how your religion can help you put on a good face for others.
3. Avoid the cross. There's an easier path. The temptation of Jesus to fling himself down from the pinnacle of the temple was an invitation that was echoed again when people at the foot of the cross mocked him saying "he saved others, let him save himself!" Make your Lent devoid of all of the harsh realities of life...don't let doubt, questions, hardship, or sacrifice be a part of your Lenten journey. Take the easy answers and insist that everyone else around you do it too. We don't ask the hard questions. Dismiss the idea that you might have to endure pain or suffering in this life...do everything you can to avoid it...if you always try to do what is right, loving, humble, and just, you may have to pay a price for it. If you try to REALLY follow Jesus and really be a disciple, you might say or do things that will make your end like his. If you insist on the way of peace, you will face violence. If you eat at the table with Samaritans and lepers and prostitutes and tax collectors: the outsiders and heretics, the untouchables, the unholy, and people with a past, they'll think your just like them...and worse yet, they may start treating you like they treat them. Constantly remind people that you aren't like "those" people. Lent is an easy journey when you live your life as an attempt to do things that are easy rather than things that are right.
But if you insist on making the hard journey of Lent...the journey that leads to the cross...
1. Be willing to hungry. To be dissatisfied with the hunger in the world. To be upset that your neighbors are neglected and mistreated and poor and marginalized. Be willing to give up some of your food, your power, your influence, your privilege to make things better for others. Don't turn stones into bread just to feed yourself, go dig up stony ground to plant a garden that can feed others.2. Worship God instead of your own self-interests. Realize that God's agenda in the world goes against the grain, and be willing to give up the recognition and religious acclamation that comes with maintaining the status quo in order to see God's will done on Earth as it is in heaven. Be willing for people to see the real you and be willing to share that authentic self with people who are more like you than you may be comfortable admitting. Don't bow down to those things that will give you all the power and fame you ever dreamed of, bow down to the God who became "Emmanuel"-God with us-and dream different dreams that include all of the "US" in the world.
3. Embrace the cross. Stop looking for shortcuts to glory and realize that sometimes, in the process of pursuing glory, there will first come suffering. Be willing to be called different, but more importantly, be willing to BE different. Be willing to be accused of being dangerous, but more importantly, be a real danger to the status quo of a world full of violence, hatred, grudges, discrimination, and religious elitism. Be willing to be like Jesus...and pay the price for being like Jesus. Be willing to be hated for loving, called a heretic for preaching truth, be called a sinner for inviting sinners like you to the Lord's table.
And here's why you should choose the hard journey of Lent. Both journeys will end in death...But only one will end in resurrection.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
I believe the Bible is the Word of God even if fundamentalists say it doesn't count.
My response in a recent Facebook discussion concerning the uncomfortable historical stories in the Bible about God ordering the killing of babies, et. al.
Part of believing that the Bible is the Word of God (not necessarily the words of God) is struggling with these difficult stories in the Bible (old and new testaments) and understanding the mindset of the people who wrote them and lived them. I often think that people ought to read the Bible like they read memoirs...with a healthy dose of caution to not interpret all of history by this one person's account, but to interpret this account in light of all of history.
I believe that the Bible is the word of God, but definitely not "100% truth" in the way that most fundamentalists mean it. It reveals my Truth to me, so I accept that as a part of my faith journey and identity. Ultimately, as a Christian, I see Jesus of Nazareth as the revelation of God to man, not a book. I don't believe the Bible is the only revelation of God to man or exhaustive or inerrant...I used to...honestly, I'm not sure what I believe dogmatically about these issues--I choose to be a questioning person rather than a dogmatic person. The Bible IS the story of peoples of faith...first, the Hebrews/Jews and then the Christians...I think the Truth is what those communities of faith bring to those stories. Unfortunately, those communities are a product of their time (and, unfortunately today, behind the times...but this was always the case-note the prophets in the Old Testament) and so you are right on to call out the xenophobia, racism, sexism, and power issues throughout the Bible. Beyond those cultural trappings, though, there is a struggle within the Bible itself...the story of the empowerment of women in the gospels and in the early church, side by side with Paul's (or the author writing in the name of the Apostle) misogynistic (and contradictory!) teachings on the role of women in the church...the laws of the Old Testament commanding the welcoming of strangers side by side with stories of the Israelites seeking to conquer their enemies (and the inflated, pseudo-historic accounts of their successes and failures in those endeavors), the teachings of Jesus against religious authority and the early church's struggle to have organization without institutional power and corruption...the picture in the Old Testament (and new at times) of a forgiving and gracious God beside a God who holds children accountable for the misdeeds of their ancestors. The Bible is the story of God trying to find humanity and it reflects the mess God finds us in, I believe. I think the nugget of truth is beyond all the cultural trappings and myth...we must constantly demyth (take the nugget of truth in the story out of the context of patriarchy, unscientific ideas, ancient concepts) and remyth (find the truth for us today). We do this with all historical writings, why should we not do this with the Bible? Fundamentalists would argue that the Bible is the Word (and, for them, the words) of God and shouldn't be examined this way. I say that we do a disservice to the scriptures and to God when we fail to truly study the Bible as both a historic and spiritual book. I think we should use the stories of sacred scriptures (and I would include others beside the Bible, for fundamentalists exist in every religion) like a lamppost, to guide our path...not like a drunk uses a lamppost--to prop himself up. Also, final note, the concept of "hell" in the Bible is pretty vague and includes ideas relating to time and eternity, so I don't fear for anyone in terms of hell the way that most Christians might...however, I do believe there are hells all around us and if Christians would spend more time rescuing people from those hells instead of trying to get people to sign on to a creed, we'd see a better world.
Part of believing that the Bible is the Word of God (not necessarily the words of God) is struggling with these difficult stories in the Bible (old and new testaments) and understanding the mindset of the people who wrote them and lived them. I often think that people ought to read the Bible like they read memoirs...with a healthy dose of caution to not interpret all of history by this one person's account, but to interpret this account in light of all of history.
I believe that the Bible is the word of God, but definitely not "100% truth" in the way that most fundamentalists mean it. It reveals my Truth to me, so I accept that as a part of my faith journey and identity. Ultimately, as a Christian, I see Jesus of Nazareth as the revelation of God to man, not a book. I don't believe the Bible is the only revelation of God to man or exhaustive or inerrant...I used to...honestly, I'm not sure what I believe dogmatically about these issues--I choose to be a questioning person rather than a dogmatic person. The Bible IS the story of peoples of faith...first, the Hebrews/Jews and then the Christians...I think the Truth is what those communities of faith bring to those stories. Unfortunately, those communities are a product of their time (and, unfortunately today, behind the times...but this was always the case-note the prophets in the Old Testament) and so you are right on to call out the xenophobia, racism, sexism, and power issues throughout the Bible. Beyond those cultural trappings, though, there is a struggle within the Bible itself...the story of the empowerment of women in the gospels and in the early church, side by side with Paul's (or the author writing in the name of the Apostle) misogynistic (and contradictory!) teachings on the role of women in the church...the laws of the Old Testament commanding the welcoming of strangers side by side with stories of the Israelites seeking to conquer their enemies (and the inflated, pseudo-historic accounts of their successes and failures in those endeavors), the teachings of Jesus against religious authority and the early church's struggle to have organization without institutional power and corruption...the picture in the Old Testament (and new at times) of a forgiving and gracious God beside a God who holds children accountable for the misdeeds of their ancestors. The Bible is the story of God trying to find humanity and it reflects the mess God finds us in, I believe. I think the nugget of truth is beyond all the cultural trappings and myth...we must constantly demyth (take the nugget of truth in the story out of the context of patriarchy, unscientific ideas, ancient concepts) and remyth (find the truth for us today). We do this with all historical writings, why should we not do this with the Bible? Fundamentalists would argue that the Bible is the Word (and, for them, the words) of God and shouldn't be examined this way. I say that we do a disservice to the scriptures and to God when we fail to truly study the Bible as both a historic and spiritual book. I think we should use the stories of sacred scriptures (and I would include others beside the Bible, for fundamentalists exist in every religion) like a lamppost, to guide our path...not like a drunk uses a lamppost--to prop himself up. Also, final note, the concept of "hell" in the Bible is pretty vague and includes ideas relating to time and eternity, so I don't fear for anyone in terms of hell the way that most Christians might...however, I do believe there are hells all around us and if Christians would spend more time rescuing people from those hells instead of trying to get people to sign on to a creed, we'd see a better world.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
What I Learned on my Summer Vacation
This July I went to Poza Rica, Veracruz in Mexico to visit my boyfriend who lives there. This was my second trip to Mexico. Six years ago I went to Durango on a mission trip with my Southern Baptist church. That trip and those people (both my fellow mission-trip-ers and the Mexican people we met) forever marked me. I've loved Mexico ever since. A month after my second trip, I have had time to reflect on what I learned on my vacation.
On this recent trip, I was reminded again and again that the man visiting Mexico in 2012 is a completely different person than the boy who went in 2006. Perhaps because of that, I found the lessons I took away and the way in which I was "marked" this time, to be of a different variety than before. So here, in three lessons, is what I learned:
We don't need to "help" people by "reaching" them...we need to connect with them because we need them as much as they need us.
MISSIONS is a word used by American Christians to mean a few different things. Mostly we use it to refer either to service (serving the poor, painting houses, building sanctuaries) or evangelism (proselytizing). When I last went, it was on a trip to what the SBC had taken to call "unreached people groups"--ethnic groups of people who's knowledge of The Gospel (copyright SBC?) was at an extremely low level. When we got to Durango, we found a group of people who identified by and large as committed Catholics. Rancheros where the main attraction of the little town was the church. But of course, Catholicism didn't count in our version of the gospel. This time around I realized how dumb that concept of evangelism is...how self-centered, proud, and egocentric...the idea that American Christians somehow need to "help" these people who aren't Christian enough in their Christianity. Because their cultural version of Christianity isn't pure Christianity like ours...you know, the kind that pledges allegiance to the American flag at Vacation Bible School (an awkward practice when you take your VBS on the road to another country), the kind that thinks the "old songs" are ones written in 1950 and published by Stamps Baxter. I learned on this trip that my cultural Christianity is important to me because Christ transforms culture and culture is just another way of God's creative work continuing in and among us, God's children. At the same time, the cultures of other people, Christian and otherwise, are not in competition with my faith but are necessary to enrich it. We ought to send American Christians across the world on mission trips...the mission should be to learn how to be better Christians by observing how other brothers and sisters across the world do this thing we call "following Jesus."Our immigration policy is immoral
This isn't a lesson about immigration reform, who to vote for in the coming election, or how to protect our borders. I don't even know the answers to those questions. I'm saying that we are asking the wrong questions. While we debate issues of national security, visit the home of your neighbors who don't have all the right papers in their chest of drawers and ask about the fears that grip them when it comes to their family, their immigration status, and the economic and social climate in their home country. While we talk about amnesty and obeying the law, go look into the face of a mother who wants her children to be safe and successful and the eyes of a young man who dreams of doing something significant and decide for yourself if geography is enough reason to ignore those wants and dreams. Our immigration policy in this country is confusing, unjust, unfair, imbalanced, broken, and ironic (as in great grandchildren of illegal immigrants, i.e. white people, deciding who gets to stay or go). But beyond all of that political discussion, it isn't just politics and policy--it's people...and how we treat these neighbors of ours is immoral and wrong. "When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God" -God. (Leviticus 19:33-34)
Church should be like a Mexican karaoke bar
One night I went out to a karaoke bar in Poza Rica. We drank tequila and people sang. And drank. And sang. And drank. And drank. But there was a marked difference between karaoke here and there. When the people in the bar knew the song, they sang out. Loudly. And as the night wore on, louder. These people who didn't know each other threw off their inhibitions to enjoy what they shared in common: love of a song. Those who didn't know the words were caught up in an atmosphere of community. The person with the mic was drowned out by those nearest me singing their hearts out. Church should be like that. People who might not normally become a community gathering in joy around something in common...in our case, Jesus. Singing our hearts out, unconcerned about how we look because it's about the song. Not reverently listening to one person perform, but becoming part of the performance ourselves, thereby lifting up the efforts of the leader but drowning them out as our song becomes a song of community...a chorus, not a solo. Nobody worried about singing too many verses. Those who don't know the song we're singing, still caught up in the atmosphere of being a community. No one bored. No one feeling awkward. No one excluded or left out (after all, if you don't know the songs we're singing, go pick your own and sing your heart out too!). Joy. Celebration. Communion. Singing. Fellowship. Diversity. Loud people and quietly smiling people. People apologizing to the next table for a friend who is a little over eager. All of these things should mark the community that follows Christ.
So many other lessons I learned on my trip--some too close to the heart to share here. But above all I learned that people aren't so different from each other. Language, culture, karaoke song choices, religions...they divide a humanity that is afraid to look at "the other" and see themselves. Perhaps, if we looked at each other and loved what we saw, we'd learn to love who God has made us too...for in each of us resides the image of God. In each of us also is the need to stop, rest, and declare with God about God's creation, "it is good."
Monday, May 28, 2012
A New Wind is Blowing in East Texas
May 20, 2012 was not Pentecost Sunday. May 27, 2012 was. May 27 was also Memorial Day weekend and Woodland Christian Church in Longview, Texas likes our high holy days to be well attended. So we just moved Pentecost up a week. Because that’s how we roll. We (basically) follow the lectionary and we sing the doxology but we are far from dyed-in-the-wool liturgical. So moving Pentecost up works for us.
May 20, 2012 was also the day of a very important vote in the life of our church. Not realizing it while scheduling everything in the month of May (do you have any idea how much stuff goes on just in May alone?!), Pentecost Sunday and the Sunday that we voted on whether or not to amend our constitution to become officially Open and Affirming fell on the same day.
Without being dramatic with the suspense, I’ll simply tell you: the vote passed with more than the 2/3rds congregational vote required to amend the constitution. The vote is historic. We are the first church in East Texas to officially declare themselves to be Open and Affirming (there may be a very select few other congregations who might fit the bill, but the denominational requirements differ or do not require a congregational vote of this nature, perhaps). We are the 5th Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) church in Texas to declare O&A and the 20th in the South Central Conference (comprised of several states, including Texas) of the United Churches of Christ to do so (we are part of the 25% of that conference who now declare ONA).
The same day of our vote, historic First Presbyterian Church in downtown Longview voted by almost the same percentage as our vote to leave the Presbyterian Church, USA (PCUSA) in protest over the denomination allowing the ordination of non-celibate gay and lesbian clergy. But that vote is just more of the same in East Texas. Why it makes news is confusing since it’s just part of the stale, old wind that’s been blowing around for years (in East Texas and the church). It’s part of the same tired arguments about taking a stand against the homosexual agenda or bowing to culture or holiness or purity or whatever other excuse we make to marginalize groups of people. But there is a fresh Wind blowing. The Holy Spirit is moving…even amid and among the tired, stale winds that threaten to calm the fierce movement of the Holy Spirit. And the Holy Spirit, well, She’s never been known to back down or settle down.
Here’s what’s most surprising about that historic vote Sunday. It didn’t feel historic. Not for me (Maybe others will comment about how it felt for them). It didn't feel life changing. I heard no rushing mighty wind. I saw no flames of fire flickering and dancing unexpectedly in the room. I felt no breeze. I heard no strange languages. I honestly felt relief. Relief that we can finally put this issue that is contentious in Christendom today exactly where it belongs—in the past. Relief that we as a church can finally be honest and proud of who we are because individuals in our body had the courage to say “enough of this wrangling over words and statements…let’s be clear and let’s do this because these people we are talking about are our family!” And we did.
The Earth did not move. There was no crowd outside stopping in their tracks asking “what meaneth this?” Actually, some just clapped and then we went to lunch (or a board meeting)! Just like every Sunday. Because what we voted on wasn’t to fundamentally change anything about our church. It was just to tell people who we are—who God has fit us together to be.
But that lack of amazing fanfare doesn’t fool me at all…this was a work of God’s Spirit and it was mighty indeed. The Wind blowing through our church on Sunday morning isn’t finished blowing. People will take notice of this. They may talk about it. And even in churches and groups where people gather to criticize our church’s stance, there may be some gay or lesbian in the closet listening…some young questioning teen or some straight teen who just can’t get their head around why the church won’t fully include their gay friends. And they’ll hear the message the Spirit of God was saying at Woodland Christian Church on Sunday: “Don’t remember the former things or think about the past. I’m doing a new thing—it’s springing up now, can’t you see it? I am making a road in the wilderness and streams in the desert to give drink to my people, the people I formed for myself so that they will declare my praise. Hey! Everyone who thirsts, come to the waters! And you who are flat broke, come buy and eat the wine and the milk that are free…” (my paraphrase from Isa. 43 and Isa. 55)
Don’t be mistaken, justice isn’t always established by far reaching legislation and legal mandates. Sometimes it is established in meekness. Sometimes it doesn’t come at a great denominational meeting in a big city with lots of delegates speaking for lots of people…Sometimes it is established in a small corner of the world in a little church in East Texas. Justice doesn’t always fix every problem, sometimes it raises our awareness of other problems and drives us to do something about them too! Sometimes a few people in an upper room get a breath of Wind and are set on fire to leave those four walls and go change the world—one moment of justice, one act of mercy, one statement of grace at a time.
![]() |
Ms. Nancy, the "kitchen queen" at Woodland! |
I could not begin to say it any better than my dear friend, Ms.Nancy, the “kitchen queen” at our church, said it:
“We are starting a new chapter in the life of Woodland Church. There should not be,nor should there ever have been any ‘us’ and ‘them.’ We are all children of God. Let’s move forward as ‘we’ and ‘our church.’ After much prayer and personal soul searching,I am certain we took the right path. Let us all work together to build ‘our’ church, and be open to being led by Him in whatever plan he has for our future. Welcome to all my precious friends…!!”
Amen! And thanks be to God!
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
"He thinks he's a liberal (bless his heart)"
FYI: I am an Obama supporter. Not because he's black and I value racial equality (I do). Not because he's cool (he is) and I'm under 30 so I like the cool guy. Not because he FINALLY said something in support of gay MARRIAGE (instead of using other euphemisms), not because I'm too stupid to be Republican or Libertarian, and not because I'm too dumb to understand his economic policy or any other policy. Not because I hate rich people (someone needs to be able to contribute more than $5 to the campaign). I am a real life, actual liberal like they show on National Geographic in its natural habitat (Portland, OR maybe). And, yes, I do know what that means even if you think (a) it's a bad word or (b) it just refers to me being okay with the gay or other social hippy free love stuff.
I actually believe in the fiscal policy of the President...because it works!
I actually believe in Health Reform...because it has made American lives better and improved a broken system.
My criticisms of the President are almost ALWAYS because he has not been liberal ENOUGH (i.e. avoiding single payer discussion, war policy, extension of Bush's anti-terrorism policies). I like it when people call the president a socialist because (1) I know he isn't one and I think it's funny and (2) I sort-of am a socialist in many ways. I favor an economic policy that redistributes wealth because ALL economic policy does that...even if you are a libertarian and think that government shouldn't even build roads and should only pay for defense, because that's just taking people's money and distributing it to the "defense industry." Rich people don't get rich on their own...the rest of us pay for the roads that ship material to and from their factory, the police force that protects their assets, the fire department that responds to fires at their factory, the education of the employees that work there, the roads and public transportation that carry those employees safely to and from work, the product safety regulation that ensures they don't use dangerous materials that could harm their business or produce hazardous products that could harm others, etc. etc. etc. I'm a liberal who actually believes in the President's tax policy...because, if implemented in full force, I believe it would strengthen a weakened middle class and close an income gap that threatens to collapse our free market economy.
Yes, I applaud the advances made for gay rights by this President. I can't imagine a gay person voting for another candidate, because none of them have the record for advancing equality for LGBT persons the way that Barack Obama does. That doesn't mean that we've arrived or that the President's record is exhaustive or perfect...equality is hard won, and can't be accomplished by a single politician, no matter how effective. Politics are still politics and involve nuance (lying) and maneuvering (manipulation). And that also doesn't mean there aren't LGBT people (or allies) that would vigorously discuss with me my inability to imagine them voting for someone else! But I would just appreciate it if people would stop talking to me like I only support Obama because I don't know any better (bless my heart).
I'm not a conservative who is gay so I have to support Obama. I don't applaud Obama's record on certain civil rights because I think that his record is perfect or because I didn't know there were gay republicans or that libertarians would sort-of let me get married too (so long as they could abolish state recognition of marriage altogether and so long as I'm religious since marriage to a libertarian is only a religious affair and not a cultural and social construct, centuries in the making).
I'm not a "fiscal conservative" who just doesn't know I have other options in this election (there's nothing "conservative" about giving tax breaks to big oil or about the top 1% of the country owning a massive percentage of GDP). I'm actually a progressive who believes the more wealth someone has, the more taxes they should pay as a larger percentage of their income, and that the biggest problem with our social welfare system isn't fraud but inaccessibility and lack of effective benefits.
I'm not a closet Libertarian who favors laissez faire economic policy or even social policy for that matter!
I do not care about the size of government as much as I care about its effectiveness. I am a civil libertarian because that's part of liberalism, not because I didn't realize there was an entire political philosophy called libertarianism that I could subscribe to. And that speaks to much of the commonality that exists among disparate factions of American political thinking...and why we should have more respect for our common ground in these discussions of politics or religion or any other divisive issue (I know: physician, heal thyself!)
I'm a liberal. And that means I favor elections where everyone can vote (easily, without hindrance, encouraging the highest turnout of voters...even in red Texas) and where you can be as Republican, conservative, Libertarian, or whatever as you want! I LOVE that so many of my friends are actually just basic conservatives (about everything except they support equality or women's rights or health care reform or whatever exception they might make that endears them to me LOL) and that so many are ACTUAL liberals who are constantly having to patiently explain that they aren't just a confused conservative who didn't know you could be for the Bush tax cuts and marriage equality at the same time. It's just that I believe people are conservative and/or to the right of me because they disagree with me about fundamental issues of policy or political philosophy...not because they don't get what being conservative means or they don't understand the issues or they are hateful or anti-God or anti-America. I just like when people treat me with the same deference. I'd rather be yelled at than dismissed.
And, just in case my positions above didn't make you mad enough...I'm not just a liberal who is a Christian, I'm also a liberal Christian...a theological liberal...but that's a whole other series of blog posts!
Now grab your pitchforks and torches and discuss... :)
I actually believe in the fiscal policy of the President...because it works!
I actually believe in Health Reform...because it has made American lives better and improved a broken system.
My criticisms of the President are almost ALWAYS because he has not been liberal ENOUGH (i.e. avoiding single payer discussion, war policy, extension of Bush's anti-terrorism policies). I like it when people call the president a socialist because (1) I know he isn't one and I think it's funny and (2) I sort-of am a socialist in many ways. I favor an economic policy that redistributes wealth because ALL economic policy does that...even if you are a libertarian and think that government shouldn't even build roads and should only pay for defense, because that's just taking people's money and distributing it to the "defense industry." Rich people don't get rich on their own...the rest of us pay for the roads that ship material to and from their factory, the police force that protects their assets, the fire department that responds to fires at their factory, the education of the employees that work there, the roads and public transportation that carry those employees safely to and from work, the product safety regulation that ensures they don't use dangerous materials that could harm their business or produce hazardous products that could harm others, etc. etc. etc. I'm a liberal who actually believes in the President's tax policy...because, if implemented in full force, I believe it would strengthen a weakened middle class and close an income gap that threatens to collapse our free market economy.
Yes, I applaud the advances made for gay rights by this President. I can't imagine a gay person voting for another candidate, because none of them have the record for advancing equality for LGBT persons the way that Barack Obama does. That doesn't mean that we've arrived or that the President's record is exhaustive or perfect...equality is hard won, and can't be accomplished by a single politician, no matter how effective. Politics are still politics and involve nuance (lying) and maneuvering (manipulation). And that also doesn't mean there aren't LGBT people (or allies) that would vigorously discuss with me my inability to imagine them voting for someone else! But I would just appreciate it if people would stop talking to me like I only support Obama because I don't know any better (bless my heart).
I'm not a conservative who is gay so I have to support Obama. I don't applaud Obama's record on certain civil rights because I think that his record is perfect or because I didn't know there were gay republicans or that libertarians would sort-of let me get married too (so long as they could abolish state recognition of marriage altogether and so long as I'm religious since marriage to a libertarian is only a religious affair and not a cultural and social construct, centuries in the making).
I'm not a "fiscal conservative" who just doesn't know I have other options in this election (there's nothing "conservative" about giving tax breaks to big oil or about the top 1% of the country owning a massive percentage of GDP). I'm actually a progressive who believes the more wealth someone has, the more taxes they should pay as a larger percentage of their income, and that the biggest problem with our social welfare system isn't fraud but inaccessibility and lack of effective benefits.
I'm not a closet Libertarian who favors laissez faire economic policy or even social policy for that matter!
I do not care about the size of government as much as I care about its effectiveness. I am a civil libertarian because that's part of liberalism, not because I didn't realize there was an entire political philosophy called libertarianism that I could subscribe to. And that speaks to much of the commonality that exists among disparate factions of American political thinking...and why we should have more respect for our common ground in these discussions of politics or religion or any other divisive issue (I know: physician, heal thyself!)
I'm a liberal. And that means I favor elections where everyone can vote (easily, without hindrance, encouraging the highest turnout of voters...even in red Texas) and where you can be as Republican, conservative, Libertarian, or whatever as you want! I LOVE that so many of my friends are actually just basic conservatives (about everything except they support equality or women's rights or health care reform or whatever exception they might make that endears them to me LOL) and that so many are ACTUAL liberals who are constantly having to patiently explain that they aren't just a confused conservative who didn't know you could be for the Bush tax cuts and marriage equality at the same time. It's just that I believe people are conservative and/or to the right of me because they disagree with me about fundamental issues of policy or political philosophy...not because they don't get what being conservative means or they don't understand the issues or they are hateful or anti-God or anti-America. I just like when people treat me with the same deference. I'd rather be yelled at than dismissed.
And, just in case my positions above didn't make you mad enough...I'm not just a liberal who is a Christian, I'm also a liberal Christian...a theological liberal...but that's a whole other series of blog posts!
Now grab your pitchforks and torches and discuss... :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)